In
the summer of 1938, Theodore Adorno set out for America to head the music
department of the Princeton Radio Project. Upon his arrival, Adorno was proudly
shown the centerpiece of the radio project’s empirical analyses: the
Stanton-Lazarsfeld Analyzer. Designed by social scientist Paul Lazarsfeld and
CBS executive Frank Stanton, the Analyzer included a green “like” and a red
“dislike” button. As music was piped into the different rooms of the project,
volunteers of different age, race and class were instructed to press the red or
green button every few seconds depending on whether
they liked what they were hearing at that moment or not. Codifying the analog
rhythm of music into binary pulses of like and dislike, the Analyzer was
digitizing desire.
Be
it
the measurement of happiness according to Twitter tweets, Facebook
likes
(but not dislikes) or the ubiquitous internet star rating of everything
from
blockbuster films to vacuum cleaners, our wants and pleasures are
constantly
being translated into a stream of digitized ones and zeroes. Tracing the
origins of today’s digitization of desire, the paper I will be
presenting in October uses
the Princeton Radio Project to explore how groundbreaking intellectual
and
cultural developments such as behavioral psychology, neoclassical
economics and consumer capitalism played a crucial role in creating the
rating-obsessed world we live
in today.
I’d
be happy to receive any comments (or a star rating 1 thru 5) and look forward to meeting you all soon!
Eli
Graduate student in Harvard University's American Studies program
Eli - are you planning to make any connections with culture of student-oriented rating of higher ed? Are online book reviews the new peer review? Do you think professional academics are uniquely impacted by this trend? I'm looking forward to your talk!
ReplyDelete